Blog
What the numbers actually say about mobile app onboarding (and what to track)
Sep 17, 2025
Onboarding is one of those product areas where feelings (it should be friendly, short, delightful) meet hard math. If you’re building a mobile product, the onboarding you ship, or don’t, shows up quickly in your retention, activation and conversion numbers. Below we pulled together concrete metrics and case signals from real studies and case studies so you can make data-driven decisions instead of design-by-instinct.
Onboarding moves the needle, but it’s noisy
A handful of studies and benchmarks point to the same pattern: good onboarding can meaningfully increase retention and activation, while poor or lengthy onboarding causes high early drop-off. Those outcomes aren’t hypothetical, they show up in cohorts and A/B tests.
Key numbers from the field
Retention lift: Benchmarks and practitioners report that effective onboarding can boost retention by up to ~50% in some contexts: a large, measurable swing when you get the first experience right.
Huge early drop-off: Estimates vary, but multiple sources show 21–72% of users abandon during onboarding when it’s frictiony or too long. That range is wide because onboarding designs differ, but the headline is clear: too many steps = too many lost users.
Day-1 / Day-7 retention norms: Global benchmarks show steep early declines: roughly ~26% day-1, ~13% day-7, and ~7% day-30 across many apps which makes early onboarding the most important window to influence long-term behavior.
Onboarding campaign impact (real market data): Apps that ran onboarding campaigns had better next-day return rates in Q2 2024: about 20% returned the next day versus 16% overall in the same period, according to aggregated industry data. This shows campaigns that actively onboard users can move short-term retention metrics.
Case studies, activation gains are realistic: Published case studies show dramatic results when teams optimize onboarding: examples include activation increases of ~75% in 10 days for one product and specific redesigns that moved activation from 40% to ~80% in other UX case studies. Those are intentional redesigns, not bolt-on marketing, and they illustrate how much room for improvement often exists.
What those numbers mean
Small percentage changes compound. A 5–10% improvement in Day-7 retention multiplies lifetime value and lowers CAC payback time. Several sources point out that even small retention improvements are highly profitable for SaaS/apps.
Onboarding is not just UX polish, it’s a revenue lever. If onboarding increases activation or conversion (i.e. getting users to an “Aha” moment), the downstream effect on subscriptions or purchases can be large. Some reports show personalized onboarding can increase conversions by up to 200% in specific experiments.
Benchmarks are noisy: use them to set targets, not rules. Industry averages (day-1/day-7/day-30) are a helpful sanity check, but your app’s category, user intent, and acquisition channel will shift those numbers. Use them to prioritize experiments.
Metrics you should track this week
Onboarding start rate: % of installs that begin any onboarding flow.
Onboarding completion rate: % of starters who finish the essential onboarding steps. (Easy to compute and directly actionable.)
Drop-off by step: the funnel that pinpoints which screen/permission/step loses users.
Time to activation: time (minutes/hours) until a user reaches your defined “Aha” moment.
Day 1 / Day 7 retention by cohort: compare cohorts that saw different onboarding variants.
Conversion/monetization lift: track how onboarding cohorts convert to trial, subscription, or purchase.
Permissions granted rate: for apps that need permissions (notifications, location), measure acceptance during onboarding.
Quick A/B ideas that cost little and test fast
Trim one step. Remove the least valuable screen and measure completion + activation.
Defer heavy asks. Move credit-card requests, large permission prompts, or lengthy form entries until after initial value is delivered.
First-run checklist vs micro-task. Try splitting onboarding into one small meaningful task (e.g. add first item / follow first person) and compare to a multi-screen tutorial.
Segmented flows. If you know user intent from acquisition channel or a single choice in the first screen, route users to a tailored short path.
Final thoughts
Numbers don’t replace judgement, but they do force better prioritization. The studies and cases above show onboarding is not “nice to have”, it’s where a big portion of product value is earned or lost. If you’re planning experiments, focus on completion, time-to-activation and step-level drop-off, those metrics tell the clearest story fast.
(Data and benchmarks referenced from public studies and case reports by Appcues, UserGuiding, Adjust, Airship via eMarketer, Userpilot and others.)